If you’re not sure, see /r/Art, /r/Illustration or /r/graphic_artUpon release, the Mac Pro was one of, if not the best Mac for high power computing tasks, however, with the evolution of software and recent releases of new Apple devices, the Mac Pro has been edged off of the top spot by the iMac Pro. Designs must convey an idea or message. Find the current product version by going to Help > About Adobe Acrobat Reader DC.No purely artistic or aesthetic submission. They recently made a public update to Premiere Pro 2021 and Media Encoder 2021 (version 15.4.0) that will be compatible with Apple silicon by default, even when you don't ask for it (of course only if your system is compatible, with a M1 chip for now).The configuration file defines the GCAM scenario that is run. Adobe has been working for a year to bring Apple silicon compatibility to their Adobe Creative Cloud software.See /r/CrappyDesign or /r/designmemesWhen asking a question, please research this sub for similar questions. See /r/identifythisfontNo crappy design, memes. Job posts belong in /r/forhire, /r/DesignJobs or /r/jobsNo Typeface identification. (Adobe CS4, CS5, CS6, CC 2014/2015/2017/2018, and other products with the.Please do not post student work & "just for fun" pieces unless it is a significant capstone project and marks an important step in your design career.No solicitation contests, free consultancy, or spec work.
![]() ![]() ![]() What Is The Best Configuration For Running Adobe Products Mac Pro WasI would speculate that a lot of the time advertising, ubiquity, popularity, and trendiness have just as much influence on the consumer as the actual product's merits. I need to be able to run adobe illustrator / photoshop but for the most part i don't want to go through the hassle of rejigging a windows machine to avoid issues when coding for linux (which is primarily what majority of servers are running).Despite the lower specs i have concluded that in terms of balance and performance that macbook pros seem to offer the best value for designers / developers though as i have conceded before:For example perhaps some people might not be as concerned with battery life, in that case more powerful components and thus performance would be an option.I agree with a lot of your points, but you're oversimplifying why people buy MacBooks. It is designed to promote efficiency in a specific type of workflow, which may seem trivial to some but a timesaver to others.My own reason for looking at a macbook pro after years of dealing with other laptops is that after a thorough investigation of pretty much all the options it is the best solution for me as a fullstack dev. Im a long time windows user but ill be looking for a macbook soon :PFirstly i should clarify im ONLY talking about the laptop space here, if you're fine with a desktop then build your own, and run windows, no question or doubt that's the best choice.Not saying that they don't design and source out good hardware, but I'm tired of Apple's marketing department distorting the truth.Citing that brands use the same ODM for assembly has nothing to do with product design itself, nor component design, nor quality assurance testing the machines are put through.As you say you must compare on a product by product basis, so name me another machine that is unix based, does not feature the best hardware specs but still sells for alot of money? Dell developer edition would be a contender except that it does not occupy the same premium marketspace.As to why apple products sell for a lot of money the answer is simple. As a result apple pretty much only put nvidia chipsets in their machines and thus was part of the reason they got a good rep for adobe with designers.These days adobe does provide some openCL support thus both AMD and Nvidia are supported, however IIRC there are still some features that are proprietary nvidia.The other reason is that to begin with apple have been EXTREMELY good with their screen resolutions vs battery balancing and color gamut is top notch.Honestly if you have the option i'd go with a macbook pro 15" but nothing stops you from doing a little research and getting an equivalent windows machine.P.S. Any designer that doesn't have a firm grasp on Adobe products doesn't have that base.It's because in the beginning adobe leveraged certain aspects of hardware which apple designed and created their quality assurance around.For example adobe leveraged nvidia architecture (CUDA cores) when it came to anything graphical thus boosting performance while ATi (now AMD) was left out in the cold. Cue bin mac iso emulatorI'm not saying that designing a laptop, assembling it, and creating an operating system is trivial by any means, just that other companies selling laptops are doing the exact same thing and sometimes they best Apple. To be honest I'm not exactly sure what components they specifically manufacture. On my desktop.The point I was making is that Apple's laptops are mostly using 3rd party parts (CPU, GPU, RAM, SSD, even motherboard components) and Apple is just designing the layout as well as the motherboard and a few parts. I can run OS X, Windows, Linux, BSD, etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorTheresa ArchivesCategories |